Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions of Interactive Presentation Tools for Flipped Classroom Support: A Data-Driven Study in Secondary Physics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v10i1.1742Keywords:
Flipped Classroom, Interactive Presentation Platforms, Physics Learning, Student Engagement, Teacher's PerceptionAbstract
The rapid development of digital technology has encouraged the integration of various interactive presentation platforms into classroom learning, particularly in physics education, which requires active engagement and deep conceptual understanding. However, the wide range of available platforms often makes it challenging for teachers to identify tools that are pedagogically appropriate for classroom instruction and flipped classroom implementation. This study aimed to explore physics teachers’ perceptions of interactive presentation platforms and to examine their potential in supporting student engagement and flipped classroom learning. A descriptive quantitative survey approach was employed involving 17 pre-service physics teachers enrolled in the Teacher Professional Education Program at Universitas Terbuka. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire supported by open-ended responses and analyzed using descriptive statistics, including mean scores and standard deviations, complemented by limited qualitative interpretation. The findings revealed that most platforms were generally perceived positively by respondents. However, Nearpod and Lumio consistently received the highest evaluations, particularly in supporting structured learning flow, classroom interaction, and learning continuity within flipped classroom environments. Qualitative responses further highlighted instructional control, integrated learning activities, and feature flexibility as important considerations in platform selection. These findings suggest that the selection of interactive presentation platforms should consider pedagogical alignment in addition to technical interactivity. This study provides empirical insights that may support teachers and educators in selecting digital platforms that are better suited to flipped classroom learning in physics education.
References
Abel, V. R., Tondeur, J., & Sang, G. (2022). Teacher Perceptions about ICT Integration into Classroom Instruction. Education Sciences, 12(9), 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090609
Akram, R., Waqar, Y., & Raza, A. (2023). Learning Innovation Utilization in Technical Education: A Quantitative Study. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 5(4), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v5i4.171
Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Educational technology: Exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools. Cogent Engineering, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282
Almaiah, M. A., Alhumaid, K., Aldhuhoori, A., Alnazzawi, N., Aburayya, A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Lutfi, A., Al Mulhem, A., Alkhdour, T., Awad, A. B., & Shehab, R. (2022). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Digital Information Technologies in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. Electronics, 11(21), 3572. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11213572
Bancong, H., Nurazmi, & Sirajuddin. (2023). High school physics teachers’ perceptions and attitudes towards thought experiments in Indonesia. Physics Education, 58(4), 045011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acdb37
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 23.1200.1-23.1200.18. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Chandrasekar, A., Clark, S. E., Martin, S., Vanderslott, S., Flores, E. C., Aceituno, D., Barnett, P., Vindrola-Padros, C., & Vera San Juan, N. (2024). Making the most of big qualitative datasets: a living systematic review of analysis methods. Frontiers in Big Data, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1455399
Creswell, J. W. ., & Plano Clark, V. L. . (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage edge.
Diamah, A., Rahmawati, Y., Paristiowati, M., Fitriani, E., Irwanto, I., Dobson, S., & Sevilla, D. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of technological pedagogical content knowledge-based training program in enhancing pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.897447
Feng, J., Yu, B., Tan, W. H., Dai, Z., & Li, Z. (2025). Key factors influencing educational technology adoption in higher education: A systematic review. PLOS Digital Health, 4(4), e0000764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000764
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Education.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Han, S. (2022). Flipped classroom: Challenges and benefits of using social media in English language teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996294
Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2020). Do Teachers Matter? Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Interactions and Student Engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
Holderied, A. (2011). Instructional design for the active: Journal of Information Literacy, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.11645/5.1.1519
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
Loizou, M. (2022). Digital Tools and the Flipped Classroom Approach in Primary Education. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.793450
Nyirahabimana, P., Minani, E., Nduwingoma, M., & Kemeza, I. (2023). STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF MULTIMEDIA USAGE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING QUANTUM PHYSICS: POST-ASSESSMENT. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.37
Ohlenburg, H., Arnemann, P.-H., Hessler, M., Görlich, D., Zarbock, A., & Friederichs, H. (2024). Flipped Classroom: Improved team performance during resuscitation training through interactive pre-course content – a cluster-randomised controlled study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05438-7
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Pinargote Bravo, B. J., & Pita Asan, M. J. (2023). Interactive strategy to strengthen the teaching-learning process of the subject of Atomic and Nuclear Physics. Minerva, 2023(Special), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v2023iSpecial.117
Sablić, M., & Mirosavljević, A. (2024). Implementing Flipped Classroom in the Digital Learning Environment. Education and Self Development, 19(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.1.04
Santoso, P. H., Istiyono, E., & Haryanto. (2022). Physics Teachers’ Perceptions about Their Judgments within Differentiated Learning Environments: A Case for the Implementation of Technology. Education Sciences, 12(9), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090582
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Shatri, K., & Shala, L. (2022). Evaluating the Effect of Interactive Digital Presentations on Students’ Performance during Technology Class. Education Research International, 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3337313
Singh, M. N. (2021). Inroad of Digital Technology in Education: Age of Digital Classroom. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120980272
Sukma, E., Ramadhan, S., & Ikhlasani, I. (2024). Elementary teachers’ perspective on Nearpod in flipped classrooms. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1472
Ullah, A., & Anwar, S. (2020). The Effective Use of Information Technology and Interactive Activities to Improve Learner Engagement. Education Sciences, 10(12), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120349
Veytia Bucheli, M. G., Gómez-Galán, J., Cáceres Mesa, M. L., & López Catalán, L. (2024). Digital technologies as enablers of universal design for learning: higher education students’ perceptions in the context of SDG4. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00699-0
Vidak, A., Movre Šapić, I., Mešić, V., & Gomzi, V. (2024). Augmented reality technology in teaching about physics: a systematic review of opportunities and challenges. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 023002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad0e84
Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rika Aprianti, Khoirotun Nadiyyah, Juli Firmansyah, Widiasih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
