Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Menggunakan Teams Assisted Individualization (Pembelajaran Sains Materi Gerak)
Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Ability Using Teams Assisted Individualization (Motion Material Science Learning)
Abstract
The aims of the Research are to difference of learning result and ability of critical thinking before and after treatment (treatment). Methods used with pretest and posttest for learning outcomes; questionnaires for students' critical thinking skills. Data analysis technique used reliability test, normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test of t one party test. The result of data analysis shows: 1) Based on pre test result, initial condition of student before using cooperative learning model type Teams Assisted Individualization experimental class 74,9 and control class 75,3 medium category. 2) end ability test to train students critical thinking ability show result tcount> ttable or 3,934> 1,684 (significance level 5%) means there is influence of cooperative learning model type Teams Assisted Individualization. 3) There is difference of critical thinking ability of class VIIA student with VIIB Junior High School Ma'arif Mlandi for 77 for experiment class and 75 control class and critical thinking ability equal to 79,6 with high category. 4) There was an increase in learning outcomes before and after the treatment of cooperative learning model type Teams Assisted Individualization of 74.9 to 77References
Hanggara, Y., & Jafri, F. (2016). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Numbered Heads Together ( Nht ) Dan Teams Assisted Individualization ( Tai ) Ditinjau Dari Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(1), 1–5. Retrieved from http://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/JPPM/article/view/972
Kahar, M. S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Siswa SMA kota Sorong terhadap Butir Soal dengan Graded Response Model tinggi dan perhatian suatu teorema atau khususnya berpikir matematis tingkat penyekoran Graded Response Model ( GRM ), merupakan salah satu pendek. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah 02, 2(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v2i1.1389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v2i1.1389
Masitoh, I., & Prabawanto, S. (2016). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika dan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Melalui Pembelajaran Eksloratif. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 7(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17509/EH.V7I2.2709.G1764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v7i2.2709
Paul S, (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika, Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Darma
Sugiyono. (2011). Statistika Untuk penelitian Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Suharsimi A. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi), Bumi Aksara, Jakarta,
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132290
Wulansari, A. D. (2014). Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Divisions Dan Team Assisted Individualization. Cendekia, 12(1), 157–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v12i1.373
Copyright (c) 2017 Ahmad Khoiri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.