Effectiveness of Digital Media-Based Contextual Learning on Critical and Creative Thinking Skills in Photosynthesis for Elementary Students

Authors

  • Gumgum Gumilar Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Harsono Harsono Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Murfiah Dewi Wulandari Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Choiriyah Widyasari Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v9i2.1713

Keywords:

Contextual Strategy, Digital Media, Critical and Creative Thinking, Photosynthesis, Primary School

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of contextual strategies based on digital media in improving critical and creative thinking skills on photosynthesis material in elementary schools. This study was conducted at SDN Sukasenang, Singaparna, Tasikmalaya, West Java. The population and sample of this study were fourth-grade students, with a total of 116 students. The sampling technique used was availability sampling or area sampling using a quantitative experimental control group pretest-posttest research method. Data were collected through pretest and posttest tests, and analyzed using the t statistical test and one way ANOVA. The results showed that contextual learning strategies based on digital media were effective in improving students' critical and creative thinking skills, with a significant increase in posttest scores compared to pretests. The average contextual score on critical thinking skills increased from 80.93 on the pretest to 87.52 on the posttest, and the average contextual score on creative thinking skills increased from 74.86 on the pretest to 81.40 on the posttest. This study confirms that digital media-based contextual strategies have a positive impact on the development of critical and creative thinking skills of grade 4 students of Sukasenang Tasikmalaya public elementary school, with digital media-based contextual strategies on critical thinking skills showing superior results. Based on these findings, researchers hope to make a meaningful contribution to the development of the world of education.

References

Alojaiman, B. (2021). Toward Selection of Trustworthy and Efficient E-Learning Platform. IEEE Access, 9, 133889-133901. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114150.

An, T., & Oliver, M. (2021). What in the World is Educational Technology? Rethinking The Field from The Perspective of The Philosophy of Technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066.

Anjarsari, M., Rochmiyati, R., & Distrik, I. W. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar berbasis Kontekstual pada Pembelajaran Tematik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 4(2), 462-474. https://doi.org/10.51214/bocp.v4i3.347.

Bascandziev, I., Tardiff, N., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (2018). The Role of Domain-General Cognitive Resources in Children’s Construction of a Vitalist Theory of Biology. Cognitive Psychology, 104, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.03.002.

Brod, G., Breitwieser, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Bunge, S. A. (2020). Being Proven Wrong Elicits Learning in Children–but only in those with Higher Executive Function Skills. Developmental Science, 23(3), e12916. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12916.

Brod, G., Kucirkova, N., Shepherd, J., Jolles, D., & Molenaar, I. (2023). Agency in Educational Technology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Implications for Learning Design. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09749-x.

Damşa, C., Nerland, M., & Andreadakis, Z. E. (2019). An Ecological Perspective on Learner‐Constructed Learning Spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2075-2089. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12855.

Daniel, S. (2019). Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences: A Practical Introduction with Examples in SPSS and Stata. Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4.

Ding, R., Ma, R., Liao, J., Tong, L., Xin, Y., & Huo, T. (2022, September). Research and Implementation of Curriculum Cluster Modern Teaching Model Based on Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm. In 2022 International Conference on Education, Network and Information Technology (ICENIT) (pp. 5-11). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENIT57306.2022.00010.

Dobozy, E., & Cameron, L. (2018). Special Issue on Learning Design Research: Mapping the Terrain. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4390.

Febriansyah, A., Nofrianda, E., Setiawan, A., & Lubis, A. (2023). Pembelajaran E-Learning dengan Aplikasi Quizizz sebagai Media Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 3942-3951. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.6333.

Fiorella, L., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Drawing Boundary Conditions for Learning by Drawing. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1115-1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9444-8.

Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. United States of America: Cengage learning.

Gu, X., Ritter, S. M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2024). Online Creativity training: Examining the Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Training Approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(1), 403-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09820-2.

Habibi, H. (2016). Pengembangan Strategi Pembelajaran IPA Kontekstual berbasis Ekosistem Mangrove. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v6i2.288.

Hamzah, F., Abdullah, A. H., & Ma, W. (2024). Advancing Education through Technology Integration, Innovative Pedagogies and Emerging Trends: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 41(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.41.1.4463.

Harsono, H., Setiawan, A., & Ningrum, R. M. (2022). Implementation of Augmented Reality as a Supporting Learning Media at Community Learning Centers in Malaysia. Prosiding Webinar Pengabdian Masyarakat, 222-228. https://doi.org/10.23917/abdimas.1484.

Jaya, I. (2019). Penerapan Statistik untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Jayawardana, H. B. A. (2017). Paradigma Pembelajaran Biologi di Era Digital. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 5(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v5i1.5628.

Kemendikbud. (2020). Laporan Pendidikan Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Khoiriyah, A. N. (2014). Pengembangan Media Video Animasi Proses Fotosintesis pada Mata Pelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas 5 SDN Jajartunggal III/452 Surabaya. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan, 2(2). https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jmtp/article/view/7636.

Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Guilford Publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276.

Markwick, A., & Reiss, M. J. (2024). Reconceptualising the School Curriculum to Address Global Challenges: Marrying Aims‐based and Powerful Knowledge Approaches. The Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.258.

Marshall, R., Pardo, A., Smith, D., & Watson, T. (2022). Implementing Next Generation Privacy and Ethics Research in Education Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 737-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13224.

Nareswari, T. J., Wijaya, H. W., & Setiawan, N. C. E. (2024). Development of STEAM-2C: Integrated Acid-Base Digital Book Based on Malang Local Wisdom. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 481, p. 04003). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448104003.

Pertiwi, D. L., & Putra, L. D. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Video Animasi Interaktif Materi Fotosintesis Kelas IV di Sekolah Dasar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(3), 3334-3346. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/10520/4734.

Privitera, G. J. (2022). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Rocha-Bravo, M. G., & Golovátina-Mora, P. (2024). A Sentient Planet as a School; a School as a Community Garden: Toward Eco-Creative Think-Practicing. Qualitative Inquiry 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241232922.

Rogers, J., & Révész, A. (2020) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. In: McKinley, J and Rose, H, (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. (pp. 133-143). London, UK: Routledge.

Saad, A., Elbashir, A., Abdou, R., Alkhair, S., Ali, R., Parangusan, H., ... & Al-Thani, N. J. (2024). Exploring of the Gender Variations in 4Cs Skills Among Primary Students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101510.

Suhandi, A., & Kurniasri, D. (2019). Meningkatkan Kemandirian Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual di Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Gentala Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.22437/gentala.v4i1.6972.

Sutama, S., Hidayati, Y. M., & Novitasari. M. (2022) Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (1st ed). Surakarta, Indonesia: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Thakare, Y. A., & Walse, K. H. (2024). A review of Deep learning image captioning approaches. Journal of Integrated Science and Technology, 12(1), 712-712. https://pubs.thesciencein.org/journal/index.php/jist/article/view/a712/430.

Tyerman-Marsh, J. R. (2024). Educational Technology Essential for Innovation. In Practices That Promote Innovation for Talented Students (pp. 197-220). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5806-8.ch009.

Wahyuningtyas, R., & Sulasmono, B. S. (2020). Pentingnya Media dalam Pembelajaran Guna Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i1.77.

Wedyawati, N., & Lisa, Y. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta. Deepublish.

Yustina, A., Susanti, M. M. I., & Rustamti, M. I. (2021). Peningkatan Kedisiplinan dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual. Elementary: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(3), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.51878/elementary.v1i3.297.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30